На главнуюНовости и политикаПохожее видеоЕще от: The Young Turks

BREAKING: Senate Votes To Restore Net Neutrality

Оценок: 2213 | Просмотров: 78046
This is one step in a larger fight. Cenk Uygur and John Iadarola, hosts of The Young Turks, discuss. To get even more TYT in your life, go to https://TYT.com/app and download our free app! Read more here: https://www.vox.com/2018/5/16/17360318/net- neutrality-senate-vote-result "The Senate voted by a narrow margin on Wednesday to preserve net neutrality and repeal a controversial Federal Communications Commission ruling to dismantle it. But the fight is far from over. A vote to open debate on the ruling passed 52-47, after which the vote on the ruling itself also passed 52-47. Going into the debate, the creator of the Senate resolution, Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA), seemed confident petitioners had the votes needed to push the measure through the Senate. In the final vote, a few Republicans swung in favor of the ruling, including Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), John N. Kennedy (R-LA), and Susan Collins (R-ME). The petition allowed Congress to undo the FCC’s December repeal of net neutrality using the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which lets Congress reverse — and, crucially, permanently block — any federal regulation with a simple majority vote.”* Hosts: Cenk Uygur, John Iadarola Cast: Cenk Uygur, John Iadarola *** The Largest Online News Show in the World. Hosted by Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian. LIVE STREAMING weekdays 6-8pm ET. http://www.tytnetwork.com/live Subscribe to The Young Turks on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=theyoungturks Like The Young Turks on Facebook: http://facebook.com/theyoungturks Follow The Young Turks on Twitter: http://twitter.com/theyoungturks Buy TYT Merch: http://www.shoptyt.com Download audio and video of the full two hour show on-demand + the members-only post game show by becoming a member at http://www.tytnetwork.com/join/. Your membership supports the day to day operations and is vital for our continued success and growth. Young Turk (n), 1. Young progressive or insurgent member of an institution, movement, or political party. 2. A young person who rebels against authority or societal expectations.(American Heritage Dictionary)
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Текстовые комментарии (772)
Telly Vin-a (26 дней назад)
it's totally backwards that the house (which is supposed to be more aligned with the citizens wishes) is where this bill will fail
John Smithe (30 дней назад)
Called It! Google, Amazon and Microsoft have deeper pockets that AT@T and Comcast. Threatening net neutrality threatens their control of a Cloud Computing sector worth over 60 billion dollars!
Jo Pao (30 дней назад)
Yah but the ISPs issue more bribes, so as far as republican politicians are concerned, net neutrality is evil. Currently, the republicans have a larger majority in the House than the senate so flipping a couple ones to care about what America wants and needs won't be enough.
phasedreality1 (1 месяц назад)
This is the right thing to do, but I am always cynical as to the reason this made it through the Senate. The legislators who voted for this were certainly lobbied by huge corporations like Google and Facebook who were opposed to the repeal of net neutrality. Gone are the days of truly principled votes. The money is all that matters anymore.
Jo Pao (30 дней назад)
"for the first time Google and Facebook are on the right side of history"... not actually rare for them to be on the right side of history... they often are. The problem is with that fascist administration, Google and Facebook will soon be used to go after political enemies, so the rest of the world should force them to hold all personal information for Europe in Europe, China in China and so on. And not just hold, but under constant supervision by the locals.
Tun Huang (1 месяц назад)
Actually I don't think Google and Facebook lobbied much. It's easy for them to get on the premium lane. The real losers are smaller companies and new start-ups.
شيخ جوجل (1 месяц назад)
phasedreality1 for the first time Google and Facebook are on the right side of history
Aj Walker (1 месяц назад)
I see it passing the house. Moderate Republicans will help pass this bill. Trust me, with the farm bill dead we are gaining momentum. (moderate Republicans weren't the ones who helped kill this bill but it gave Dems more momentum we need)
Aj Walker (1 месяц назад)
Some not so much in the house but the Senate for sure
Aj Walker (1 месяц назад)
Nurlinda F Sihotang the ones in Congress are
Nurlinda F Sihotang (1 месяц назад)
hey. be fair. not all republican are tea-party loons..or trumptard..
Aj Walker (1 месяц назад)
Tricob1974 let me restate. Not conservative.
ladydacious (1 месяц назад)
Smoke screen
mike b (1 месяц назад)
VFORVENOM (1 месяц назад)
Americans talk about net neutrality as if the US government controls the entire world's internet and makes the rules. Guys, this only affects the US and it's ISP's. Net neutrality exists in other countries under their own governments and then there are other countries where net neutrality actually doesn't exist in fact.
Barrie Wright (18 дней назад)
Okay I didn't know that ! , thanks.
Chris Ashcroft (29 дней назад)
The internet doesn't recognize borders. This will affect everybody.
Jorin Ryms (1 месяц назад)
VFORVENOM It depends. It would affect other nations as well because US-based services such as Netflix are also used by those who do not live in the US. If Netflix were to get bumped to a premium lane, it would affect every Netflix user, not just US-based users.
Nick (1 месяц назад)
It still has to get through the House though... which it won’t.
Aaron Turner (1 месяц назад)
Now, politicians are starting to think about their Google search history. Lol.
Mark Chang (1 месяц назад)
Yeah it is back!
Silkendrum (1 месяц назад)
Um, no. The House has to approve also, and they probably won't.
freedom1234573 (1 месяц назад)
can we fire Ashit now?
Elroi The Overseer (1 месяц назад)
I liked the internet before everyone and their mother started using it. The normies destroyed the internet period.
GarlicPudding (1 месяц назад)
Pretentious, aren't we? "HURR DURR TEH NORMIES DURR"
L O (1 месяц назад)
my internet still works. fake news.
Tricob1974 (30 дней назад)
I think L O just surpassed Trump in the ignorance department. It takes a special kind of incompetence to accomplish this. Kudos!
ladydacious (1 месяц назад)
I hope this is ironic
Vera Nika (1 месяц назад)
GarlicPudding or a troll
Vera Nika (1 месяц назад)
The start date is in June. Fact check first ;)
GarlicPudding (1 месяц назад)
bigdaz7272 (1 месяц назад)
Forgive my ignorance not from US but a Bill needs to pass in the Senate vote, then it moves onto the House vote and if it passes both the President has to agree to sign it into Law, if he Veto's the bill in its current form it has to be amended and pass through the Houses again, correct? You don't don't have multiple readings and chances for amendments as a bill is voted through both houses (Commons and Lords) like in the UK before it gets ratified, just a once through if nothing changes?
Freewheelin' Franklin (1 месяц назад)
It's both, they need 2/3's of both houses at that point.
bigdaz7272 (1 месяц назад)
Cheer Franklin but when you say it goes back to congress is that like having the Senate *or* is it more like having the House vote again, i assume the House yes?
Freewheelin' Franklin (1 месяц назад)
bigdaz7272...Yes & NO. If Trump vetoes it, it goes back to congress & if they can get a 2/3's vote it becomes law without the Presidents signature. They don't have to amend it. It could work the way you described by amending it & again giving it to the President if they're unable to get a 2/3's vote.
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
I think it's more complex as the house can amend a bill, in which case, a reconciliation process has to happen and if successful, then the bill is sent to the WH.
Lon Brooklyn (1 месяц назад)
But will it pass the House?Probably a fantasy!
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
Not this house, but maybe the house coming after November midterms.
xnoidedhermitx (1 месяц назад)
israel did 9/11.
xnoidedhermitx (1 месяц назад)
Lon Brooklyn search the greater israel project, dancing israelis on 9/11, USS liberty attack, and AIPAC.
Lon Brooklyn (1 месяц назад)
xnoidedhermitx I don't know which country profited but weapons manufacturers certainly made some money after.I don't believe in conspiracy view of Israel did it!
xnoidedhermitx (1 месяц назад)
Lon Brooklyn how come? tell me who profited the most off of the iraq war.
Lon Brooklyn (1 месяц назад)
xnoidedhermitx That's rediculous.I don't believe ithat for a moment!
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
No, Israel didn't do 9/11
Lobos222 (1 месяц назад)
Republicans like to be rape victims... Even when they say no. They still bend over and take it up the ass by the people they elected. LoL
mike b (1 месяц назад)
itchyballszzz (1 месяц назад)
Stop roasting mike b. mike b doesn’t know any better
BadWebDiver (1 месяц назад)
You sound desperate! I think you protest too much. If TYT was as bad as you say it is, you woudn't have to make this comment!
ladydacious (1 месяц назад)
This home taught mental illness is a national health crisis.
mike b (1 месяц назад)
Jason Achilles HEY CUTIE PIE :-)
mike b (1 месяц назад)
bohemianwriter1 MAYBE :-)
MemphiStig (1 месяц назад)
it's too bad we don't have a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people." U$A! U$A! U$A!
Master Of Da Skies (1 месяц назад)
U$A/AmeriKKKa, for the people, by the people (as long as those people are rich white men).
Garlic Breath (1 месяц назад)
Ed Meares (1 месяц назад)
The battle is not over.
D Mc (1 месяц назад)
Wow! Now we need to go after the house.
Edgar Chavez (1 месяц назад)
Sadly, it will never pass on the GOP controlled house, they will not even vote. In the remote case it passes, the 'Stable Genius' will VETO it.
Tokusatsu Keyblade (1 месяц назад)
Edgar Chavez The objective isn't to win the vote, it's to make the issue largely known and force political parties to take their stance on the issue. With the midterms coming up, and with the House's opinions on the matter on the record, we can pressure them with our votes and threaten their chances in the upcoming elections. We are trying make the house and the current administration understand that the majority of the American people want to keep net neutrality, and if they refuse to give to us, we refuse to give them our votes and refuse to support them in any way.
David Bates (1 месяц назад)
That this was as close as it was is a disgrace. That it passed only to now be denied in the next building of corruption is despicable.
Pat Cook (1 месяц назад)
That's nice... Impeach them All.
Edward Bernayse666 (1 месяц назад)
net neutrality helps the GOP base as well as the democratic base. without net neutrality, trump would've never gotten elected and hillary would be president. that's not a statement against net neutrality at all but instead a point to the GOP that voted against net neutrality about biting the hand that feeds you and just how out of touch they are when it comes to how influential the internet is. their side can and has used it effectively to help them the same way that .......then again, net neutrality could be seen as a threat to the corporate donors who would like to gain more control over the content that is on the internet. that's seems to be all these senators and congressman care about and so of course they .......now i get it. :D
Aaron Wantuck (1 месяц назад)
What does it matter at this point. With it being that close Trump is only going to Veto it.
Asher Tye (1 месяц назад)
Aaron Wantuck then we keep pushing. We don't let it die and be forgotten. Eventually Trump will fade into a nonissue and we'll break it through.
Craig Bartel (1 месяц назад)
Nice , we can make a list of those 47 that voted against it. The states need to make their own laws to void the federal government.
quleughy (1 месяц назад)
All Republicans voted against restoring Net Neutrality except for Collins, Kennedy, and Murkowski. McCain didn’t (couldn’t) vote for obvious reasons.
ToneyCrimson (1 месяц назад)
But damn its way to close
deenman23 (1 месяц назад)
freedom died this day
mitch gaby (1 месяц назад)
No! Freedom rang this day!
Cliven Longsight (1 месяц назад)
deenman23 No. It got innoculated against Republican big government interference and corporate greed. Might not take long term, but at least it's a step in the right direction.
Rare Pepe #daesh (1 месяц назад)
The porn is safe.
Susan Hepler (1 месяц назад)
I'm afraid Trump will veto it thou.
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
Actually, the president of the electoral college can veto it. Sad *makes an anus mouth.
DeVaughn Currie (1 месяц назад)
No it gos to the Senate where it won't win...
Rare Pepe #daesh (1 месяц назад)
The president has no word in these things. Jesus Christ, at least do some research, or find out what a president can or cannot do.
Virginia Evans (1 месяц назад)
I am not sure he can
Amos Soma (1 месяц назад)
The senate voting to restore net neutrality is like finishing third in a 3 man race. You came in last but you can claim that you finished third in a race.
Timefliesbye (1 месяц назад)
Like it should have been. There should have been a law passed that guaranteed net-neutrality rather than the Obama strategy of temporary solutions.
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
So it's Obama's fault that republicans are trying to destroy net neutrality because Obama didn't manage to get a congress dominated by republicans to ever sign on anything with his name on it? Same for Iran? Seriously? The party of "personal responsibility" is full of s***. As for warning the Iranians that they, the republican party, would start warmongering as soon as back in office just tells you how committed to wars that party is. Also, since the republicans dominate congress and the WH house currently, a treaty wouldn't be in any way more secure. Luckily, there is a solution: throw all republicans out of office. There, solved.
Timefliesbye (1 месяц назад)
Jo Pao that they CAN do it. Same with Iran Deal. Because congress did not pass it it is NOT a law. It is an executive order. An ink thin bandaid. Notice how I support Net Neutrality saying it should be a law. Obama wanted legacy points he didn't care for long term. So he executive branched it into existence and now you are left holding an empty bag. The republicans warned Iran about this. If they signed this deal they would run the risk of another president stepping in and just whiping it off the table. The Irani aren't that experienced with democracy you see.
Tricob1974 (1 месяц назад)
Thank you, Jo. :-)
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
Yah, it's Obama's fault that republicans are trying to destroy net neutrality... what a tool
Earthboundmike (1 месяц назад)
Didn't Obama put Ajit Pai there?
Katzelle3 (1 месяц назад)
Ajit Pai worked for the FCC even before Obama was elected.
Brayden Borrell (1 месяц назад)
He was already in the organization but Trump gave him a peomotion
Timefliesbye (1 месяц назад)
Yes he did. Trump gave him a promotion.
CLureCo (1 месяц назад)
Earthboundmike , He was in the FCC, but trump made him chairman.
Dave Rhoden (1 месяц назад)
Why would 47 vote against restoring net neutrality with 80% of the population supporting net neutrality in an election year?
Idiot Test (1 месяц назад)
Find out who voted against and vote them out make it public
DJUNKNOWNxx (1 месяц назад)
Dave Rhoden because they dnt care what the people want, its all about the money donors
Virginia Evans (1 месяц назад)
Dave Rhoden Hacks they couldn't care less what people actually want
Jimmy Early (1 месяц назад)
The reason is not just money...it's money in addition to politicians who believe voters don't know or care enough to make them pay come election time.
lextacy2008 (1 месяц назад)
Now it goes to the House of Fraud to be voted on
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
The House is currently like that ideal vision of justice weighting the pros and cons with it's balance... but it weights bribes exclusively.
Virginia Evans (1 месяц назад)
lextacy2008 No kidding
laze man (1 месяц назад)
Rupublicans and democrats aren't really that different they should just blend they're ideologies into one there would be way less political division in the us Watch my comment get angry replies
Aaron Turner (1 месяц назад)
jacksprat418 that's petty. It's blatant to me he was typing faster than usual.
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
"Rupublicans and democrats aren't really that different "... yah, all dems voted to restore net neutrality and all repubs but 3 voted against... or as laze man says: "all the same".
Matthew Veverka (1 месяц назад)
laze man rEpublican, theIR
Michelle R (1 месяц назад)
jacksprat418 😂😂😂😂
Jon Harvey (1 месяц назад)
52 to 47? I don't find those numbers reassuring...
Virginia Evans (1 месяц назад)
Jon Harvey Me either
Pranay (1 месяц назад)
Conservatives are morons.
Alexander Mills (1 месяц назад)
Aaron Turner (1 месяц назад)
Yanny cuh
Asher Tye (1 месяц назад)
alaysia kaye butler (1 месяц назад)
yep!! gotta save that kinda shit, the best of net neutrality diversions,. lol. Laurel..
humboldthammer (1 месяц назад)
I see Q People or I seek Ewe People. "Baaaa'd!" that's what she(ep) said. Hey! It's EweToo(b). Be sure to check auto-sheep, I mean, ship. Wanna know how to differentiate between BS and Bias? BS makes scents.
Heath Fletcher (1 месяц назад)
Laurel, I am 43 so some hearing loss is expected.
Greg B (1 месяц назад)
Every Democrat voted in favor and only 3 Republicans...but there is no difference between the parties, right bernie bros
wannabchomsky (1 месяц назад)
quleughy it’s isnt conflating anything retard. Both take money. Hence both are influenced by their corporate/ wealthy donors hat help them get re-elected It’s literally the most obvious thing in the world
quleughy (1 месяц назад)
wannabchomsky Really? Because it seems like it’s the “both parties take corporate money” types who focus on a single issue (corporate money in politics) to conflate the two, while the rest of us have been paying attention to the many other issues where, you know, they disagree.
quleughy (1 месяц назад)
Zotan Inoron “Isn’t a lot of difference”? Sure, buddy. Okay. Let’s just ignore the contrasting stances both parties have on the ACA, social security, Medicare, taxes, gun control, reproductive rights, sex education, contraception access, teaching creationism in the class rooms, lgbt rights, the voting rights act, climate change, alternative energy, social welfare programs, DACA, immigration, and of course net neutrality. But sure, if you ignore all those things, the two parties have very few differences.
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
You want more issues with such divided votes? How about the Iraq war? Or that awful last tax bill? Maybe the Iran nuclear deal? Or Citizen United? Clearly the dems can be fuckups too, but nowhere near as constantly as the "conservatives".
wannabchomsky (1 месяц назад)
Greg B you chose a single vote on a single issue, and think this is representative of the parties general voting pattern as being corporatist republican lites? You are retarded... please stop embarrassing yourself
Vera Nika (1 месяц назад)
Brett Nine (1 месяц назад)
Well done Senate. Could they make it the start of a roll - moving on to orange matters.
Samy Ali Aragon (1 месяц назад)
Let's go 🙏
Helen Short (1 месяц назад)
It's a temporary reprieve. They only did it for the mid-terms
DeVaughn Currie (1 месяц назад)
Helen Short only 3 repubs vote for it
Vera Nika (1 месяц назад)
Helen Short Anyone who is sane knows that only 3 voted for and almost all of them are against. but then again common sense is sadly not too conmon
Michelle R (1 месяц назад)
Helen Short Republicans know they are finished, but they won’t go down without a fight
Helen Short (1 месяц назад)
Vera Nika true but this was done to try to secure more Republican votes. If, for whatever reason, the blue tidal wave doesn't happen (and if it doesn't happen it will be because the Russians ensure it doesn't happen, especially if the sanctions and Magnitsky Act are still being enforced) the Republicans will get rid of Net Neutrality - it will be one of the first things they do. One thing for sure is no one can assume that the Dems will take control of any of the branches. Toppling the regime is going to take work.
Vera Nika (1 месяц назад)
Helen Short if Dems take over the Senate it will stay ;)
Spartan3s (1 месяц назад)
Yay we won
Christian Barrett (1 месяц назад)
The 47 nays need to be removed from office.
Steven Anchundia (1 месяц назад)
Vera Nika (1 месяц назад)
Christian Barrett some may go at the mid terms ;)
John Smith (1 месяц назад)
But the party's are the same !! Imwas told
altrag (1 месяц назад)
Or vote progressive (and hope they actually stick to their guns after the old school dems have been ousted.) Just to clarify -- there's a distinction made (not just by me) between "progressive" democrats and "establishment" democrats. Those who make the distinction are referring to the latter when saying they're basically the same as republicans. Progressives are practically a whole new party with wholly different views building up within the dem's shell. (And yes, I think it would be awesome if we could see some progressive republicans as well and get politics back to being about issues rather than party affiliation.. but it doesn't seem to really be happening over on that side.)
John Smith (1 месяц назад)
altrag your right just don't vote or vote GOP to move the dems to the... left ...I'm sure it will work out 👍
altrag (1 месяц назад)
They're the same in the sense that they all work for their donors instead of for you. Apparently in this case, Verizon and Comcast didn't think to pay off the Democrats. Or perhaps Google/Facebook/Apple/whoever just paid them more.
Andrew Berrocal (1 месяц назад)
Now you earned our vote to keep you In office. For now
Melpheos1er (1 месяц назад)
Is this an alternate reality, something got achieved in the Senate ?
Aqueous Entropous (1 месяц назад)
Melpheos1er Something was taken away and it is now being returned. Relatively, we are on even ground. Doesn’t change the system which works against the people, however.
Richard Jones (1 месяц назад)
It will never pass in the house.
FeistyGiga (1 месяц назад)
thescopedogable (1 месяц назад)
OK republicans honest qestion how can you possibly imagine the Republican party is on your side.
quleughy (1 месяц назад)
Coy Hampton I’m not sure if you’re joking, but that’s probably the answer. Well, that and all the rich people who don’t want to pay taxes.
Coy Hampton (1 месяц назад)
Secular Guy (1 месяц назад)
52 to 47 Shame on those 47! Scum fuckers of the Earth. The vote should have been unanimous.
Aaron Wantuck (1 месяц назад)
+Secular Guy Very well stated.
Secular Guy (1 месяц назад)
David Smith *"+SpurnOfHumanity my point is that everyone is entitled to an opinion and it must be respected"* Absolutely not! Everyone is *entitled* to their opinion. That is what is to be respected. The opinion itself, if bad, is not worth respecting. For instance, you're entitled to think that all fat people are evil. I would respect your right to hold that view. But I don't respect that view itself. As to my original point, specifically, they have the right to vote in any way they please. And I have a right to viciously disagree with their vote. That's democracy working in both ways.
Aaron Wantuck (1 месяц назад)
+David That is really no point when you understand what Net Neutrality is. A vote against it is like a vote against competition in the markets and free trade on the internet of ideas and solutions. Everything the US stands for economically. I mean seriously you might as well hang a sign that says, "I am for big businesses and monopolies!".
SpurnOfHumanity (1 месяц назад)
whats your point?
Bluereason (1 месяц назад)
cool, Democrats in office only fight for things that have been lost. At this rate, people are going to have to lose a host of things before the party starts acting like it representing the people, and even then we'd just be back to this shithole that is the current Presidency and political state
Aaron Wantuck (1 месяц назад)
No true.
Edward Maxwell (1 месяц назад)
Bluereason exactly. Democrats are paid to be pathetic losers. They always have to check with their corporate masters before doing /saying anything.
un mog (1 месяц назад)
What I wouldnt give for it to actually get to his desk so he has to veto it.
un mog (1 месяц назад)
Because politics. Trump would have to... eh, I don't feel like explaining it. He'd look like a chump, and be going against the majority of people including the ones who voted for him and out himself as bought and corrupt.
Aaron Wantuck (1 месяц назад)
Why would you want it vetoed?
boyzing (1 месяц назад)
And then to be overridden and forced to sign... sigh... now i have to change my shorts... Damn it...
PinkPonyOfPrey (1 месяц назад)
shithole country
meagainstthewrld (1 месяц назад)
Chaos is a ladder that just shows how F'ed up the planet is, NOTHING TO BE PROUD OF.
PinkPonyOfPrey (1 месяц назад)
Chaos is a ladder Maybe you should do something about your fact resistance?
Chaos is a ladder (1 месяц назад)
PinkPonyOfPrey best country on the planet.
J. Z (1 месяц назад)
Trump will never sign off on this!
Idiot Test (1 месяц назад)
He may not be in there that long haha
Vera Nika (1 месяц назад)
J. Z well, then he makes it even worse for the GOP at the midterms ;)
thomas grabkowski (1 месяц назад)
Great. Net neutrality won. Glad it did
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
It only won a battle, sadly.
Miranda Holland (1 месяц назад)
The internet is something that effects everyone in the country including most members of congress. I think this bill is going to get more votes in the house than people think. And if this bill passes the house, I'm not worried about POTUS veto. If it passes the house, that means they more than likely have enough votes in the Senate to override the veto. I suspect Republican members of Congress don't want their internet messed with anymore than they want their electricity or their hot water messed with which is bad for lobbyist. I wonder why none of these talkin heads seems to be making this Common Sense argument
Miranda Holland (1 месяц назад)
Aaron Wantuck selling out their mothers and children is easy for these guys. The question is, how many of these guys would sell themselves out. How many members of Congress would vote against their own best interest to increase their net worth? We'll find out when the House votes
Aaron Wantuck (1 месяц назад)
Are you kidding? Some people will sell out their own mother if it meant they get an extra dime in their net worth.
altrag (1 месяц назад)
The internet isn't going anywhere. What it will do is get significantly more expensive for average users. For you and me, our $100 internet bill suddenly tripling (to get similar levels of service) is a tough pill to swallow. But most members of Congress are at least millionaires. Another $2400/yr for them is practically pocket change. Of course there will be cheaper options available for us plebs, but they will be significantly more restrictive than what we've gotten accustomed to over the past 20ish years. Primarily (assuming they invent no new horrors,) this is likely to come in the form of tiered "fast lane" packages, and while the rest of the internet will still be generally accessible, anything outside of the packages you purchase will be horrendously slow by comparison. Like maybe 20-50mbps while your "packaged" sites run at 100+mbps or something along those lines. They may also try metered billing at some point but as far as I know there's nothing preventing that anyway and even cell phones have been moving away from the practice as consumers absolutely hate it and the first mover would probably get themselves crushed unless they severely underpriced their plans for the first few years while the rest of the industry switched over and consumers just no longer have a choice. This one seems pretty unlikely in the short(ish) term but I wouldn't count it out completely when any questioning of practices like zero-rating is removed from the debate. Zero rating is already treading on very thing ice with respect to net neutrality but getting rid of NN clears that right up.
axion (1 месяц назад)
Lets hope trump just signs without reading it there a chance for that
Jo Pao (1 месяц назад)
Maybe if they stop him from taking "executive time", holidays or golfing until he signs it.
davelanger (1 месяц назад)
Isn't there a veto proof number of votes they could get? Not that it will ever happen but pretty sure if they get a certain number of votes, Trump can't veto it. Or is that not possible because the Senate​ only won by 5 votes.
Megatron97tf (1 месяц назад)
davelanger it is possible to override the president’s veto, however in this case the measure passed in the senate but will probably fail in the House since the Reps have the majority. Unfortunately, if the House shoots it down it doesn’t go the the president to be signed.
jungle305 (1 месяц назад)
how you allowed this shit cow,penis,monkey worshiping subhuman to head this important institution. this shit disgusting Indian must be sent to his shithole poverty stricken India, otherwise he will forget himself and shit in Washington monument in the middle of Washington, DC, thinking he is in India.
FeistyGiga (1 месяц назад)
KING T'CHENKA your pfp is one of the greatest things I have ever seen
KING T'CHENKA (1 месяц назад)
Ottiti Spiti (1 месяц назад)
Of all the things you can criticize Ajit Pai for, why would you choose something personal? Keep it intellectual.
Rene Dulnuan (1 месяц назад)
Be as you are Senate continue your favoritisms after all I am just about to finish you off and send you all to hell !
Rene Dulnuan (1 месяц назад)
Senate NET Neutrality ? Is there such a Thing? Continue what you are accustomed of favoritisms eversince , we'll see ! don't worry we can manage we are not that greedy or hungry!
Marie Patrick (1 месяц назад)
When Are They Going To Impeach Him, He Has His Foof In The Door, To Start Dictating, Just Like Putin, He Has His Hands On Everything, Every Button He Will Be Abole To Push Will Make Progress,,,American People Will Be Sorry They Let Him Go This Long,
PinkPonyOfPrey (1 месяц назад)
Only morons capitalize all the words in their post. What were you thinking?
Gouky (1 месяц назад)
Net Neutrality is a retarded concept
GarlicPudding (1 месяц назад)
So screw customers, only the company matters. Got it. Let's see you try that corporate BS when ISPs throttle speeds on a site YOU like.
Gouky (1 месяц назад)
Because they should be able to, based on the network load
GarlicPudding (1 месяц назад)
Gouky How is companies NOT being able to limit your access to certain sites retarded?
Vera Nika (1 месяц назад)
Gouky you STILL don't get it. I give up :)
Gouky (1 месяц назад)
So monopolies enforced by the goverment are the problem not net neutrality?
Richard Alexander (1 месяц назад)
Shit Pie must be very angry about this. Too bad the republikkkan house won't help out.
Bubbles McGee (1 месяц назад)
This will end in failure it's only symbolic.
Kryojenix (1 месяц назад)
If you're talking about the Trump presidency or the Republican Party overall, I agree with you.
rickiex (1 месяц назад)
Idk if to be happy or sad, considering a vast majority of Republicans voted to destroy the internet
Bubbles McGee (1 месяц назад)
rickiex no they voted to leave it alone like we always have because that's what made the internet great.
Steve Smith (1 месяц назад)
The only problem is, the Government labeled "Net Neutrality" is NOT a free and open internet. It's a Government controlled internet.
GarlicPudding (1 месяц назад)
Steve Smith Wrong. Utterly.
Aaron Wantuck (1 месяц назад)
+Steve Smith *"Government control is Communism, you Dipshit!"* Every hear about the Dunning-Kruger effect, asshole.
Aaron Wantuck (1 месяц назад)
Oh for Fuck's sake. No it is not you stupid moron. There is nothing wrong with government regulation that protects consumers. You have it when you use electricity, the regulations to make sure you have clean water free from certain deposits like lead, the food you buy in the supermarket is not rotting and will not kill you, prescription drug testing, and the list goes on and on. All Net Neutrality says is that the ISP can not favor or block websites even if those websites offer better services then they do. Like Netflix.
Steve Smith (1 месяц назад)
Government control is Communism, you Dipshit!
Willie Hardiman (1 месяц назад)
Damn that was close
Balla21 (1 месяц назад)
Huge win
John DeF (1 месяц назад)
Republicans wrong again.
get gud (1 месяц назад)
It's about sending a message, if they're gonna take our free speech from the net MAKE THE BASTARDS OWN IT!
Renegade MS (1 месяц назад)
It's going to die because it wouldn't have the votes in the House.
Mike Weiner (1 месяц назад)
Renegade MS Sadly you might be right...but I hope not.
Mr. Malloy (1 месяц назад)
That's not a 'great' job in the senate, actually very revealing of how out of touch they really are with the people, and it's kinda bad.
The Humanity (1 месяц назад)
+SpurnOfHumanity - Um. Is this a trick question? All the Dems voted in favor of the CRA bill. How do you think it was passed?
SpurnOfHumanity (1 месяц назад)
All the democrats? You do realize how many of them voted against this right?
The Humanity (1 месяц назад)
Not on the Republican side no. But at least all the Democrats did something productive for once.
zarplex2003 (1 месяц назад)
Hmm. 47 of 50 Republicans voted against Net Neutrality despite 84% of Americans supporting Net Neutrality. Republicans just keep making excuses for their own party...
Ryan Walsh (1 месяц назад)
The fact that 86 percent of the us population wants net neutrality and yet only 52 percent of senators represented the american people is abhorrent.
Jared B (1 месяц назад)
I've grown skeptical to the point that an honest dialogue has to be had with Net Neutrality. As liberals (myself included formerly) have framed it, it's all sunshine and rainbows. But I have done some more research (it's hard to find a decent rebuttal but it can be done). Particularly with T-Mobile's "binge-on" service where they provide unlimited data to certain partners (which now includes Netflix, I believe). This is a grey area that needs discussion. T-Mobile provides this service by "throttling" (really downgrading the video to 480P). But I think this is a valuable service that they're providing at a cost of bandwidth. I think, as long as they are upfront about the service (which they aren't exactly), this is a legitimate use of "throttling".
Xamufam (1 месяц назад)
the next presidential election will have to use comedy to cut trough the populism
Scholar1993 (1 месяц назад)
Eat shit and ajit pie!
Kae McSpadden (1 месяц назад)
Take that to Ajit Pai and his punchable face!
Steve Johnson (1 месяц назад)
Random Question: Has Trump ever actually asked Mexico to Pay for The Wall? I do not recall. Sorry if I missed it. Thanks TYT!
Xamufam (1 месяц назад)
the reason why wages havnt risen is because of automation, we need to find another way to spread out the wealth
Patrick Barrett (1 месяц назад)
Nobody cares about this dumbass issue 😄
SpurnOfHumanity (1 месяц назад)
Literally everyone that wants to use the internet cares.
The Humanity (1 месяц назад)
Your about 100% wrong on that. I'm sure you don't give a shit about your own civil liberties though. And freedom on the Internet. Most people care deeply though.
shiro80 (1 месяц назад)
crab_aesthetics (1 месяц назад)
This is a dumb attempt at a giveaway to Google, Netflix, and Facebook. They are driving the demand for more bandwidth due to their overwhelming use of streaming 4K traffic and don't want to pay for the network upgrades. Instead, they want YOU to pay for it.
Aaron Wantuck (1 месяц назад)
+Crab_aesthetics Let me ask you a question. When Ford started to make more cars affordable and people began to use them, was it For's responsibility to build better roads? When TV's and computers were created was it the TV manufactures and say IBM's job to build power plants? Your logic is as stupid as when older neighborhoods start upgrading their home's cooling systems to AC from say evaporative cooling. If the electric company needs to update your transformer to handle the load since the transformer on the street level that the entire block uses can not handle the load they charge with its replacement. Everyone else benefits especially the other homes that change over to AC in the future but you were forced to pay for something that is not your responsibility since you already pay them to provide you a service and then pay to use that service. It is not Google, Netflix, and Facebook's responsibility to build a stronger infrastructure to handle the increasing load. It is the company who is providing that service. Telecoms since they profit from people using Google, Netflix, and Facebook. After all Google, Netflix and Facebook spend money to create more content for you to consume in the hopes they get your business.
MCouper (1 месяц назад)
Those 47 Republicans can eat shit
Heather Piers (1 месяц назад)
Kurt Callaghan (1 месяц назад)
A rare smart move by the Democrats. Shortly before the election they are forcing Republicans to go on the record against it.
Ar. Bob (1 месяц назад)
Ajit Pai ,,,,,Eat a shit pie
The Humanity (1 месяц назад)
Hey Democrats keep doing shit like this! And you will actually WIN for once
kamenriderantinomy (1 месяц назад)
Ronel Bassatt (1 месяц назад)
I’m proud to say that I was part of the movement to help fight back.
SonicTheDarkEX (1 месяц назад)
When does the next vote take place
jetter820 (1 месяц назад)
My penis gets red spots in it when I masturbate.
Mark G (1 месяц назад)
That means you are doing it right. Now get off yotube and go back to the site you were on.
Idiot Test (1 месяц назад)
jetter820 then cut it off
Cartoonking1 (1 месяц назад)
How do we keep net neutrality for going through this again.
heat cliff (1 месяц назад)
Its a hpax
Shane Thompson (1 месяц назад)
Eat a Dick ajit pai
James Puso (1 месяц назад)

Хотите оставить комментарий?

Присоединитесь к YouTube, или войдите, если вы уже зарегистрированы.